{"id":13443,"date":"2026-05-15T15:52:16","date_gmt":"2026-05-15T13:52:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/document-fraud-risks-types-exposures-and-solutions\/"},"modified":"2026-05-15T16:54:49","modified_gmt":"2026-05-15T14:54:49","slug":"document-fraud-risks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/","title":{"rendered":"Document fraud risks: types, exposures and solutions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Key points to remember about document fraud risk<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The risks of document fraud can be many: financial, reputational, legal\u2026  <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Risk control is based on three guarantees: <strong>integrity<\/strong>, <strong>date certainty<\/strong> and <strong>origin<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Prevention becomes truly effective when evidence is <strong>integrated into the flow<\/strong>, rather than added after the fact.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Qualified electronic time stamping<\/strong> benefits from a presumption of date\/time and integrity of associated data.  <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In auditing and litigation, the difference lies in <strong>restitution<\/strong>: producing legible, correlated, intelligible evidence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The different types of risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cDocument fraud\u201d is often confused with \u201cfalse document\u201d. However, in an organisation, the issue is not simply the existence of a falsified document: it is the occurrence of concrete <strong>damage<\/strong>, often immediate, and rarely isolated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Financial risk<\/strong>: undue payment, double payment, additional costs linked to a service never carried out, loss of margin, even immobilisation of cash flow while the anomaly is identified and the flows secured.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Risk of business disruption<\/strong>: blockage of a purchasing process, suspension of a delivery, manual reconstitution of a file, urgent internal mobilisation (finance, legal, IT), with a direct effect on lead times and service quality.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Reputational risk<\/strong>: loss of partner confidence, loss of credibility in the event of an audit, or the perception of poor governance when the company cannot simply explain \u201cwhich version was the right one\u201d and when.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Legal and compliance risk<\/strong>: contesting a decision, taking the company to court for negligence, difficulties in responding to a supervisory authority, and, in certain sectors, loss of eligibility for contractual or industry schemes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This impact-based approach has a practical advantage: it enables flows to be prioritised not according to the sophistication of the fraud, but according to the <strong>real cost<\/strong> to the organisation (loss, downtime, disorganisation, external exposure).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Fraud risks by sector<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Mapping by function is often more effective than a \u201cdocument type\u201d approach, because it starts from usage. In purchasing\/finance departments, the <a href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/use-case-prevention-document-fraud\/\">risk of fraud<\/a> is concentrated on documents that trigger an operation: supplier creation, payment, updating of contact details, validation of an expense. In HR, exposure comes from incoming documents, transmitted outside workflow and then integrated into a file: they are difficult to attribute and date. In the legal and sales functions, disputes frequently concern versions: appendices, clauses, pricing schedules, proof of acceptance. On the operations side, the risk increases with volume, subcontracting and the field (mobile), as documents become attestations of a fact (delivery, intervention, acceptance).    <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Purchasing and finance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The classic pattern is well known: an \u201cactionable\u201d document circulates (RIB, invoice, order form), then an element is modified the moment it leaves the controlled chain. The more the flow depends on e-mail or shared spaces, the more discreet the substitution. The consequence is not just loss: it\u2019s the effort involved in proving that the original version of the payment order has been found, who transmitted it, and that it has not been altered.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">RH<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In HR, the risk often takes the form of a recomposed file: a receipt arrives in a photo, a PDF is renamed, an item is replaced \u201cfor updating\u201d. The legal difficulty arises when the company has to prove the origin and date of receipt (or date of issue) of a sensitive document, in a context of conflict or control. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Legal and commercial<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Fraud is rarely frontal: it takes the form of a dispute (\u201cthis is not the annex transmitted\u201d, \u201cthe clause has been added\u201d, \u201cacceptance has not taken place\u201d). The risk is greatest when the opposable version has not been stabilised at the right time, or when proof of acceptance is based on traces that are difficult to contextualise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Construction, supply chain, operations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/timestamping-supply-chain\/\">the supply chain and the construction industry<\/a>, documents attest to the facts: quantity delivered, weighed, received, conformity. Fraud and disputes are fuelled by volume and intermediaries. In certain supply chain contexts, the requirement for traceability transforms proof into an operating condition, and the fragility of proof becomes a risk of operational non-compliance.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">E-commerce and platforms<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In the <a href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/timestamping-promotional-prices-omnibus-regulation\/\">e-commerce sector<\/a>, the risk often takes the form of an external challenge (controls, requests for justification) relating not only to PDFs, but to data: histories, event logs, proof of publication. The legal question becomes: can the organisation quickly produce coherent, unalterable proof over a given period?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Reducing the risk of fraud: controls, governance and proof by design<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Reducing risk does not mean \u201cover-securing\u201d every document. It means securing what, if challenged tomorrow, would generate disproportionate legal costs. Organisational measures form the first stage: version repository, imposed channels for sensitive documents, roles and access rights, double validation for certain events (change of bank details, modification of appendices, issue of certificates). However, these controls reach a limit as soon as the document circulates between several tools or actors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is where \u201cproof by design\u201d comes into play: integrating guarantees into the flow that stabilise the version and enable <a href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-detection-in-business\/\">fraud to be detected<\/a>. The three structural guarantees are <strong>integrity<\/strong>, <strong>date certainty<\/strong> and <strong>origin<\/strong>. In practice, these guarantees are based on two instruments that are particularly useful in organisations: <strong>qualified electronic time-stamping<\/strong> and <strong>electronic stamping<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Integrity<\/strong>: being able to demonstrate that content has not been modified. <a href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/qualified-timestamping\/\"><strong>Qualified time-stamping<\/strong><\/a> anchors a document\u2019s hash to a specific date and time; any subsequent modification renders the hash inconsistent with the timestamp token.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Date certain<\/strong>: to anchor a state\/version at a specific point in time, in an opposable manner. In the European Union, a <strong>qualified electronic timestamp<\/strong> benefits from a presumption on the accuracy of the date and time it indicates, as well as on the integrity of the data to which it refers (eIDAS regulation, art. 41[1]). <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Origin<\/strong>: verifiably attribute the document to the issuer, in particular the legal entity. The <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/electronic-seal\/\">electronic seal<\/a><\/strong> plays a role comparable to that of a company stamp: it links a document to the identity of the issuing organisation and indicates any alteration, thus reducing the risk of version substitution in document flows (attestations, certificates, official statements, contractual documents).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Preparing for audits and litigation: building a usable evidence file<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>An organisation can have multiple traces (logs, exports, e-mails) and remain fragile for lack of intelligible restitution. In auditing, as in litigation, we don\u2019t ask for an accumulation of evidence: we ask for a coherent demonstration. A usable <strong>file of evidence<\/strong> must make it possible to reconstruct the chronology (who, what, when) and identify the opposable version. It brings together, in a structured way: the version of the document, integrity elements, dated events (filing, validation, transmission, acceptance), the origin of the issuer, as well as the storage logic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:36px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Document fraud risk<\/strong> is managed less as a hunt for forgeries than as a mastery of uncertainty: knowing how to stabilise a version, establish a date, attribute an origin, and restore a chronology. The method is progressive: qualify the types of risk, map exposures by function\/sector, reduce grey areas through controls and proof integrated into the flow, then prepare restitution with a view to an audit or litigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The challenge for a legal department is simple: to avoid discovering at the moment of disagreement that the evidence is scattered, illegible or questionable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:41px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-16018d1d wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-background wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/contact-evidency\/\" style=\"background-color:#0c0171\">Contact our team to assess your exposure to document fraud<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:43px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>[1]Regulation (EU) No 910\/2014 (eIDAS), Article 41 (legal effect of electronic time stamps): https: <a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/reg\/2014\/910\/oj?locale=fr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/reg\/2014\/910\/oj?locale=fr<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:100px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Disclaimer of liability<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The opinions, presentations, figures and estimates presented on the website, including the blog, are intended for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For legal advice you should contact a legal professional in your jurisdiction.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The use of the content of this website, including the blog, for commercial purposes, including resale, is prohibited without prior authorisation from Evidency. The request for permission must specify the purpose and extent of reproduction. For non-commercial purposes, all material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is required, together with a link to this website. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key points to remember about document fraud risk The different types of risk \u201cDocument fraud\u201d is often confused with \u201cfalse document\u201d. However, in an organisation, the issue is not simply the existence of a falsified document: it is the occurrence of concrete damage, often immediate, and rarely isolated. This impact-based approach has a practical advantage: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":246879328,"featured_media":13442,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6425,6482,6345],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[6458],"class_list":["post-13443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cachet-electronique","category-fraude","category-horodatage","author-marine-yborra"],"acf":{"profil":"","bio":""},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Document fraud: the risks<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The risk of document fraud undermines processes and fuels audits and litigation: types of risk, details by sector, &quot;proof by design&quot; and the creation of a usable file of evidence.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Document fraud: the risks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The risk of document fraud undermines processes and fuels audits and litigation: types of risk, details by sector, &quot;proof by design&quot; and the creation of a usable file of evidence.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Evidency\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-15T13:52:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-15T14:54:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"950\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marine Yborra\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nicolas Peigner\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nicolas Peigner\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c4fba2cace4e9303d552b60ebdc0618d\"},\"headline\":\"Document fraud risks: types, exposures and solutions\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-15T13:52:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-15T14:54:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/\"},\"wordCount\":1320,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cachet \u00e9lectronique\",\"Fraude\",\"Horodatage \u00e9lectronique\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/\",\"name\":\"Document fraud: the risks\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-15T13:52:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-15T14:54:49+00:00\",\"description\":\"The risk of document fraud undermines processes and fuels audits and litigation: types of risk, details by sector, \\\"proof by design\\\" and the creation of a usable file of evidence.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp\",\"width\":950,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"document fraud risks\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Evidency\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Document fraud risks: types, exposures and solutions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Evidency\",\"description\":\"Sp\u00e9cialiste de la preuve num\u00e9rique\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Evidency\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/header-logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/header-logo.svg\",\"width\":275,\"height\":58,\"caption\":\"Evidency\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/evidency-io\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c4fba2cace4e9303d552b60ebdc0618d\",\"name\":\"Nicolas Peigner\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/a071e9b393d0615a4fc88b28477f483e\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e715d858349a05f43035c04618d0dd510a10a05de09616ec2dac22d1fc3f8c1b?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e715d858349a05f43035c04618d0dd510a10a05de09616ec2dac22d1fc3f8c1b?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nicolas Peigner\"},\"description\":\"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus aliquet dolor vel molestie pellentesque. Curabitur vitae condimentum lectus, ac laoreet magna. Nullam eu tortor odio.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/evidency.io\/author\/nicolas2805\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Document fraud: the risks","description":"The risk of document fraud undermines processes and fuels audits and litigation: types of risk, details by sector, \"proof by design\" and the creation of a usable file of evidence.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Document fraud: the risks","og_description":"The risk of document fraud undermines processes and fuels audits and litigation: types of risk, details by sector, \"proof by design\" and the creation of a usable file of evidence.","og_url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/","og_site_name":"Evidency","article_published_time":"2026-05-15T13:52:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-15T14:54:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":950,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Marine Yborra","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nicolas Peigner","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/"},"author":{"name":"Nicolas Peigner","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c4fba2cace4e9303d552b60ebdc0618d"},"headline":"Document fraud risks: types, exposures and solutions","datePublished":"2026-05-15T13:52:16+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-15T14:54:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/"},"wordCount":1320,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp","articleSection":["Cachet \u00e9lectronique","Fraude","Horodatage \u00e9lectronique"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/","url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/","name":"Document fraud: the risks","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp","datePublished":"2026-05-15T13:52:16+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-15T14:54:49+00:00","description":"The risk of document fraud undermines processes and fuels audits and litigation: types of risk, details by sector, \"proof by design\" and the creation of a usable file of evidence.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/risques-fraude-documentaire.webp","width":950,"height":500,"caption":"document fraud risks"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/document-fraud-risks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Evidency","item":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Document fraud risks: types, exposures and solutions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/","name":"Evidency","description":"Sp\u00e9cialiste de la preuve num\u00e9rique","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#organization","name":"Evidency","url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/header-logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/header-logo.svg","width":275,"height":58,"caption":"Evidency"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/evidency-io\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c4fba2cace4e9303d552b60ebdc0618d","name":"Nicolas Peigner","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/a071e9b393d0615a4fc88b28477f483e","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e715d858349a05f43035c04618d0dd510a10a05de09616ec2dac22d1fc3f8c1b?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e715d858349a05f43035c04618d0dd510a10a05de09616ec2dac22d1fc3f8c1b?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Nicolas Peigner"},"description":"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus aliquet dolor vel molestie pellentesque. Curabitur vitae condimentum lectus, ac laoreet magna. Nullam eu tortor odio.","url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/author\/nicolas2805\/"}]}},"modified_by":"Camille Lehur","authors":[{"term_id":6458,"user_id":0,"is_guest":1,"slug":"marine-yborra","display_name":"Marine Yborra","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Marine-1.webp","url2x":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Marine-1.webp"},"author_category":"1","first_name":"Marine","description_complete":"<p>Marine Yborra is the Chief Marketing Officer at Evidency, where she leads the company\u2019s marketing strategy. With over twenty years of international experience in both B2B and B2C environments, she has developed strong expertise in brand strategy, positioning, and activation. Her career, spanning diverse sectors and business models, gives her a unique ability to make complex, high-value solutions accessible and relevant to demanding markets.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>At Evidency, Marine is responsible for defining and communicating the company\u2019s value proposition to legal professionals, businesses, and organisations operating in regulated industries. She drives initiatives to raise awareness of Evidency\u2019s role as a Qualified Trust Service Provider (QTSP), ensuring that its solutions, ranging from qualified timestamping and electronic seals to long-term compliant archiving, are clearly understood and widely adopted. She translates regulatory and technical topics into actionable insights, helping professionals ensure the authenticity, integrity, and legal validity of their digital evidence.<\/p>","domaine_dexpertise":"<ul>\r\n \t<li>Communication and digital strategy<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Digital transformation<\/li>\r\n \t<li>B2B and B2C<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>","last_name":"Yborra","user_url":"","job_title":"CMO","linkedin":"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/marine-yborra-marketing\/","description":"Marine is the Chief Marketing Officer at Evidency. A specialist in branding and brand activation, she has international experience in both B2B and B2C."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/246879328"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13443"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13446,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13443\/revisions\/13446"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13442"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13443"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evidency.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=13443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}