Evidency / Blog / Trust service provider (TSP): definition, role and legal implications of trust services

Trust service provider (TSP): definition, role and legal implications of trust services

Reading time: 4 min
Modification date: 28 January 2026

The dematerialisation of exchanges and procedures has profoundly transformed the way organisations create, retain and present evidence. In this environment, the mere existence of an electronic document is no longer sufficient. Its evidential weight, its legally reliable date and its integrity must be capable of being demonstrated.
This is precisely the role of trust service providers, also referred to as TSPs, whose involvement now structures the legal framework of digital trust.

prestataire de service de confiance PSCo

Key points on trust service providers

  • A trust service provider (TSP) delivers trust services intended to guarantee the authenticity, integrity and legally reliable dating of electronic documents and data.
  • The reference legal framework is the eIDAS Regulation, which governs the recognition and evidential value of digital trust mechanisms.
  • Trust services include, in particular, electronic signatures, electronic seals, electronic time stamping and electronic archiving with evidential value.
  • A qualified trust service provider is subject to enhanced requirements and state supervision, with certain qualified services benefiting from a presumption of reliability in the event of a dispute.
  • Recourse to a TSP makes it possible to structure a continuous chain of trust, aligned with compliance, audit and evidential production requirements in digital environments.

What is a trust service provider?

A trust service provider is an entity that supplies legally regulated technical services intended to guarantee the reliability, authenticity and integrity of electronic exchanges.

This concept is defined by the eIDAS Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of 23 July 2014), which constitutes the European legal foundation for digital trust.
Under Article 3 of the Regulation, a trust service provider is any natural or legal person who provides one or more trust services, either as a principal activity or on an ancillary basis.

These services go beyond simple hosting or information security. They produce direct legal effects, particularly in relation to evidence, enforceability and the allocation of the burden of proof.

TSPs and trust services: what does this mean in practice?

Trust services encompass several technical mechanisms, each addressing a specific legal requirement. The eIDAS Regulation distinguishes in particular:

  • Electronic signatures, which identify a signatory and guarantee the integrity of a document.
  • Electronic seals, which identify a legal person and guarantee the origin of a document.
  • Electronic time stamping, which attests that a document existed at a specific date and time.
  • Electronic archiving, where it is designed to preserve the evidential value of documents over time.
  • Website authentication services (certificates).

Each of these services answers a fundamental legal question:
who is the originator of the document, at what point in time, and can it be demonstrated that it has not been altered?

Qualified and non-qualified providers: a structuring distinction

Not all trust service providers are legally equivalent. The eIDAS Regulation draws a clear distinction between:

  • qualified trust service providers, and
  • non-qualified providers.

A qualified TSP complies with stringent technical, organisational and security requirements. It is subject to oversight by a national supervisory authority (in France, ANSSI) and is listed on the EU Trusted List.

This qualification carries significant legal consequences. Certain qualified services benefit from a presumption of reliability. In the event of a dispute, the burden of proof is shifted to the party challenging the mechanism.

By contrast, non-qualified services remain admissible in legal proceedings, but their reliability must be established by the party relying on them.

Why trust services have become indispensable

The widespread use of digital exchanges has increased the risk of challenge. An electronic document can easily be duplicated, altered or removed from its original context. In practice, disputes increasingly focus not only on the substance, but on the evidence itself.

Trust services address several practical issues:

  • Securing evidence over time. A qualified time stamp provides a legally enforceable date.
  • Guaranteeing document integrity. Any subsequent alteration becomes detectable.
  • Identifying the issuer or party responsible for a document or data flow.
  • Structuring an evidential file that is clear and intelligible for a court or supervisory authority.

These mechanisms are now central in contexts such as regulatory audits, administrative inspections, commercial disputes and internal investigations.

TSPs and electronic evidence: a chain of trust approach

The contribution of a trust service provider is not limited to the application of an isolated technical mechanism. It forms part of a chain of trust, enabling the complete history of a document or digital event to be reconstructed.

This chain is based on several elements:

  • a cryptographic fingerprint (hash) of the content,
  • reliable time stamping,
  • identification of the responsible party (natural or legal person),
  • securely retained technical logs.

In litigation, this chain makes it possible to demonstrate not only the existence of a document, but also the exact conditions of its creation and retention.

The growing importance of TSPs in light of regulatory requirements

Regulatory requirements increasingly reinforce the use of trust services. Numerous legal instruments now impose or recommend enhanced evidential mechanisms.

These include in particular:

  • traceability and auditability obligations in regulated sectors,
  • requirements for evidential retention of contractual or accounting documents,
  • rules governing electronic evidence in dispute resolution.

In such contexts, recourse to a TSP makes it possible to anticipate inspections and to limit the risk that evidence will be rejected.

TSPs and automation: an operational consideration

Trust services are no longer confined to occasional or manual use cases. They are now integrated at the core of information systems, via APIs, to process large volumes of data.

This automation makes it possible in particular to:

  • continuously certify documentary flows,
  • generate evidence without human intervention,
  • ensure consistent practices across an organisation.

From this perspective, the trust service provider becomes a structuring element of evidential governance, rather than a mere technical supplier.

Trust service providers and long-term legal value

The question of duration is central. A document may be legally challenged many years after its creation. Without an appropriate trust mechanism, its evidential weight may be entirely lost.

When combined (time stamping, electronic sealing, evidential archiving), trust services make it possible to maintain continuity of legal value, irrespective of changes in formats, systems or organisational structures.

This approach is particularly relevant for long-term contracts, sensitive files and regulatory archives.

Towards a strategic approach to trust services

A trust service provider should not be regarded as a simple IT supplier. It operates at the intersection of law, technology and evidence.

A mature approach involves identifying documents and events with high evidential significance, defining the required level of trust, and integrating trust services at the design stage of processes.

This approach makes it possible to convert legal constraints into a means of securing operations, by reducing uncertainty and strengthening the ability to defend a position in the event of a dispute.

Disclaimer

The opinions, presentations, figures and estimates set forth on the website including in the blog are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For legal advice you should contact a legal professional in your jurisdiction.

The use of any content on this website, including in this blog, for any commercial purposes, including resale, is prohibited, unless permission is first obtained from Evidency. Request for permission should state the purpose and the extent of the reproduction. For non-commercial purposes, all material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is required, together with a link to this website.

  • Camille is the Digital Marketing Manager at Evidency. With over 10 years of experience, she specialises in content management and traffic acquisition.

Recommended
for you

How to verify the authenticity of a document and prevent fraud

How to verify the authenticity of a document and prevent fraud

Key points to keep in mind about the authenticity of a document Authenticating a document means verifying its origin, its integrity and its conformity with the original. Documentary fraud is increasing: 69% of French companies are targeted by fraud, a figure that...

Interview: Is trustworthy AI possible?

Interview: Is trustworthy AI possible?

Key takeaways of this interview: Trust in AI is not limited to the quality and lawfulness of training data. Above all, it requires effective capabilities for evaluating, testing and monitoring systems and their uses. The availability and quality of data are becoming a...